NIH Research Must Be Actionable to Generate Results

Source: NIH Research Matters But It Must Be Actionable to Generate Results

After an avalanche of federal money the past ten years, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is under pressure to show results. This is no small feat given the enormous scientific challenges of cancer, heart disease, HIV, and other killers and disablers. And even though NIH’s budget more than doubled in recent years, less than five percent of government health spending goes to research into causes, treatments, and cures.

In areas where NIH and the private research community is successful, we face another challenge - getting the results or evidence into practice. According to the Institute of Medicine, it takes an average of 17 years before a proven best practice is in wide spread use for the benefit of patients. In other words, patient care in 2005 is more often based on the best science as of 1988.

Our nation’s investment in health services research - which covers how to get evidence to practice and improve access, quality, and cost effectiveness of our $1.8 trillion health system - is worse. It hovers around one percent of what we spend on NIH. Medicare and Medicaid waste more in a single day than what we spend in a year on trying to improve program performance for patients and taxpayers.

As the NIH works to demonstrate results for the taxpayers, we all need to recognize the symbiotic relationship between (a) basic and clinical research that creates new evidence and (b) health services research that shows us how to bring the evidence to the physician and patient. Right now our research system is like a auto manufacturer who spends all its money on engineering and testing new vehicles and virtually nothing on design, quality control, financing, cost management, distribution, training, sales, or marketing.

Of course, the researchers must deliver. To do this, NIH and ARHQ in particular should support more actionable research. To be actionable, research must be:

1. Timely: Better to have a good answer today than a perfect answer in a few years. All too often we allow analysis to be the enemy of action.

2. Decision Relevant: Enough of preaching to the choir and hunting for tenure. Researchers must connect with real-world decision makers and answer their questions. Other than the Nobel Prize, virtually all other forms of recognition for research have little or nothing to do with work that is actionable.

3. Translated: It’s all about reaching decision makers and unfortunately most researchers are horrible communicators. What do you think, what do you know, what can you prove, what do you suspect? Say it in the context of decision makers and their challenges.

4. Disseminated: Peer reviewed journals are great. I enjoy reading many of them. But most decision makers do not. You’re lucky if they read the abstract. Disseminate findings in new ways to reach decision makers. Multiple mediums must be used and, if necessary, created.

NIH’s new Institutional Clinical and Translational Science Awards program is a great start in the right direction.

Comments

[carpinteyrorhh]

Abercrombie and Fitch Officiel Site.Bienvenue scoot parcourir Abercrombie France attach en ligne, Abercrombie and Fitch france vente en ligne ?la wise Charitable Belstaff en France, Abercrombie parisvous pouvez acheter la qualite superieure et escompte.

[Naisp]

you must read metallic bags metallic purses for more must-have bag with confident